Profile of Novorossiya's Most Radical Rebel Commander (Alexey Mozgovoy)

Democracy and Class Struggle publish this profile of Alexey Mozgovoy to give background on his leadership prior to his murder, the article contains negative and positive comments about Alexey Mozgovoy and his struggle.

We feel the need to be honest about his limits as well as his positive contributions if the movement is to proceed in a progressive direction in Donetsk and Lugansk.

We endorse his struggle as the struggle of a comrade and regard his murder as a setback for the people's movement in Lugansk People's Republic.

Lenin was one of Mozgovoy's heroes and we will let Lenin have the last word on this comrades struggle

Lenin clarified this question for those socialists who sought to counter pose the fight for "pure socialism" to the national struggle and who had contempt for national independence and sovereignty. Lenin said :

" To imagine that a social revolution is conceivable without the revolts of small nations in the colonies and in Europe, without the revolutionary outbursts of a section of the petty bourgeoise with all its prejudices, without the movement of non class conscious proletarian and semi proletarian masses against the oppression of landlords ,the church, the monarchy,foreign nations etc.

To imagine this means to repudiating social revolution.

Only those who imagine that an army will line up and say "We are for socialism" and in another place an army will say "We are for Imperialism" and that this will be a social revolution, only those who hold such a ridiculously pedantic opinion could villify the Irish Rebellion by calling it a "putsch",

"Whoever expects a "pure social revolution will never live to see it, such person pays lip service to revolution, without understanding what a revolution is"

Lenin - Discussion on Self Determination Summed Up - 1916

Democracy and Class Struggle says Alexey Mozgovoy did not pay lip service to social revolution he was murdered trying to practice it.

We reiterate our earlier call to honour Alexey Mozgovoy by developing  the anti oligarchic struggle into  anti capitalist struggle and anti hegemonic struggle into anti imperialist struggle


One afternoon in late October, Kalashnikov-armed pro-Russian separatists led two accused rapists into the House of Culture in Alchevsk in the self-declared Lugansk People’s Republic for a “people’s court,” twisting their arms behind their backs so they were forced to bend over as they walked.

One read out the evidence gathered against the first man by the rebels‘ military police unit, arguing the 37-year-old had threatened a 15-year-old girl until she agreed to have sex with him.

Then he asked the 340 local citizens and rebels assembled in the hall to vote to sentence him “to the highest form of punishment according to the laws of wartime, death by firing squad.”

The crowd voted to send the first man to redeem himself on the front line, where rebels continue to clash with government forces. It sentenced the second man, accused of at least three rapes since 2008, to death.

A video of the people’s court caused an uproar in the Ukrainian and Russian media, especially one fragment in which Mozgovoy suggested that women should “sit at home and cross-stitch” and ordered that “any girl who goes to a bar will be arrested.”

But while critics have accused Mozgovoy of facilitating mob rule, communist and Marxist commentators have cited his outspoken opposition to the corrupt, oligarchic government that has plagued Ukraine as proof that he is the best hope to turn the pro-Russian rebellion into a social revolution.

Although the armed seizure of buildings in eastern Ukraine in April was accompanied by frequent calls for a social welfare state, communist and other left-wing activists have been marginalized by pro-Russian activists who are more nationalist in their rhetoric.

The Communist Party wasn’t allowed to run in last month’s rebel parliamentary elections and in the end was given a meager 3 seats out of 100 by the ruling coalition, its leader recently told The Nation.

Many left-wing activists have said the uprising has turned toward Russian chauvinism rather than social reform.

For his part, Mozgovoy said he does not believe in ideologies but rather “popular democracy” and argued that the recent judicial spectacle had been misunderstood.

 “To create the mechanisms for a people’s government, we need to create precedents like we’re doing with the people’s court,” he told The Nation.

But the jury is still out on the leader: Is he a socially-minded revolutionary propagating a radical form of direct democracy to eradicate years of corrupt government? Or a populist warlord conducting reckless justice and ruling his fiefdom with an iron hand?

A descendant of the Don Cossack warriors who lived in the borderlands of the Russian empire, Mozgovoy was born in the Luhansk region, studied music and sang in a choir, served seven years in the Ukrainian army and worked in the construction industry in St. Petersburg.

Returning to Luhansk in February as protests for European integration raged in Kiev, Mozgovoy joined other pro-Russian activists in holding rallies and camping out in the city center, where he first began putting together the group that would become his military unit, the Ghost Brigade.

The unit has now grown to almost 3,000 men, he said. It is arguably one of the most potent fighting forces in separatist-held territory, which has made Mozgovoi a political force to contend with in the Luhansk People’s Republic, where he has occasionally clashed with other separatist leaders.

Having established a base of operations in Alchevsk (pre-war population: 111,360), he operates largely independently of the rebel leadership in the regional capital, which doesn’t provide him with supplies or financing, he said.

Mozgovoy characterizes his war as one against oligarchy and corruption. He sees both in the new Kiev government, which he derides as a pawn of US foreign policy.

“The system in Russia and Ukraine is rotten,” he said.

“In Belarus, they all say (Lukashenko) is a tyrant but at least he destroyed a little bit of the system that’s taking over Russia and Ukraine, there is order there. Democracy is not always good. Sometimes you need to tighten the screws, but you can’t tighten them too much.”

Boris Rozhin a.k.a. “Colonel Cassad,” a communist and preeminent blogger in Crimea covering the pro-Russian movement, has called Mozgovoy the “farthest left of the (rebel) commanders,” and said the burgeoning rebel state could “have some sort of half-socialist program if Mozgovoy’s ideas win out.” Russian Marxist political analyst Boris Kagarlitsky called him a “social democrat with a radical direct democracy agenda.”

His anti-oligarchic stance—and an openness to dialogue—has allowed Mozgovoy to take on a new possible role, that of the peacemaker, in three Skype sessions with volunteer battalion commanders fighting in Kiev’s “anti-terrorist operation” against the pro-Russian rebels.

 Mozgovoi and his battlefield opponents seemed to agree upon the essential problems facing Ukraine—poverty, corruption and oligarchy—even if they differed drastically on the solutions.

During the first conversation, Mozgovoy offered that the conflict could be solved if the volunteer fighters on both sides would join together to “clean out the parliament and the government” in Kiev, a suggestion that seemed to resonate with the pro-Ukrainians present, several of whom spoke out against the government of oligarch president Petro Poroshenko.

Mozgovoy’s reputation has attracted ideologically driven far-left volunteers like the Moscow antifascist Anton Fatulayev, who was reportedly killed in an ambush in August after joining the Ghost Brigade.

According to Fatulayev’s friend and roommate Maxim Solopov, the recruiter in Rostov-on-Don who helped Fatulayev pick a rebel commander to serve under had recommended Mozgovoy because he “supports the idea of popular democracy, he takes an independent position, he doesn’t believe the Russian government, he’s an independent person and a man of strong beliefs who is fighting for ideals including social justice, and besides all that he has the reputation of a good commander who takes care his soldiers.”

But Mozgovoy’s political platform remains fluid, ill-defined and sometimes contradictory. Although he is ostensibly fighting for the creation of a pro-Russian “Novorossiya” state over a wide swath of southeastern Ukraine—he at one point suggested resurrecting the Russian empire—he said the regimes of both Russia and Ukraine run counter to true government by the people.

He admitted he is worried that the rebels in their alliance with Russia are simply trading one oligarchy for another.

Mozgovoy describes himself as a supporter of “rule by the people,” and, when pushed on what that might actually mean, said he envisions a government with direct citizen participation in policy-making, a strong social welfare component, nationalization of key industries and a division between government and business that is “written in blood.”

He said he opposed following any one ideology or dogma, although he admitted his respect for Vladimir Lenin and Nestor Makhno, the controversial leader of the brief-lived anarchist communist Free Territory in eastern Ukraine during the Russian Civil War.

He has criticized Ukraine’s Communist Party for failing to “fix anything or build anything in the socialist direction.”

The commander’s support for radical popular democracy has a darker side. By law, Ukraine doesn’t allow the death penalty such as that handed down by the people’s court, but Mozgovoi is by all accounts the ultimate authority in Alchevsk right now.

As The Nation arrived at his headquarters in a decrepit former printing press for the interview, a group of haggard-looking men swept the street outside, part of the “work therapy” Mozgovoi has instituted for minor crimes like violating the curfew or drunk and disorderly conduct.

Sitting in an office decorated with old weapons like a saber and a WWII-era submachine gun, the commander said his order to arrest woman in bars was “absurd” and that the man sentenced to death would remain alive for now.

“We didn’t conduct that court to shoot someone, but rather so people could feel how it is to make a decision themselves,” Mozgovoy said.

Both of the sentenced rapists told The Nation—in the presence of armed guards—that they were being held in decent conditions, although one had a black eye, which he said he got when he slipped on a small set of nearby steps.

Oleg Izmailov, a Donetsk-based journalist and political analyst, called Mozgovoy’s people’s court a “medieval” practice, but said it was also reminiscent of the tradition of “people’s gatherings” common in Russian villages and Cossack communities.

He added that “social revolution is closer to him than the idea of national revolution,” unlike with many rebel commanders, and admitted that Mozgovoy’s ideas have a popular appeal.

“Under the Ukrainian regime, almost all judges earned the hatred of the people,” Izmailov said.

“Those who heard cases, especially criminal ones, were not clean and everyone knew it, so the people of course welcomes this.”

But relatives of the two sentenced rapists questioned the commander’s methods.

“It was awful, there was no defense, no witnesses,” Irina Karpusha, the estranged wife of the man sentenced to duty on the front line, told The Nation when asked about the people’s court.

“Some people came there drunk and decided a person’s fate without fear of God or anything else … I’m not justifying [my husband], he’s done wrong, but it was awful.”

According to Russian Marxist Kagarlitsky, although Mozgovoy lacks an intelligible political program, such populist military leaders are typical in times of unrest. Nonetheless, he remains the “best show in town from a left of point of view,” Kagarlitsky said.

“Some are a little bandit, a little revolutionary, a little people’s hero,” he said.

“Today’s Ukraine can compare with the Mexico of Pancho Villa and Zapata, so he’s a people’s hero with all the pluses and minuses …

There were lots of such heroes in the Russian Civil War, but then the Bolsheviks put commissars from the intelligentsia above them. Nowadays there is no such left movement or intelligentsia.”

Sociologist Volodymyr Ishchenko, a pro-Ukrainian leftist commentator and a member of the editorial board of Commons: Journal for Social Criticism, said Mozgovoy has “ideas about anti-oligarchic egalitarian democracy.”

But the commander also has “conservative, sexist ideas,” he said, calling into doubt Mozgovoy’s ability to influence the separatist movement to focus more on left-leaning social reforms.

“Which precisely elements in his politics will dominate, either progressive, or reactionary, will depend not on him foremost but on the general development of the separatist movement,” Ishchenko said.

“And generally it is developing not in the left direction now.”