Friday, October 5, 2012

Kenyan Land and Freedom Movement - Mau Mau case to go to full trial

Three Kenyans who were tortured by British colonial authorities can proceed with their legal claims against the UK government, a court has ruled.

London's High Court ruled the case, relating to the 1950s Mau Mau uprising, could proceed despite the time elapsed. The ruling means the case will now go to a full trial. Lawyers for the three hailed it as a "historic" judgement.

While the government accepts UK forces tortured detainees it denies liability and will appeal against the decision.

The government had initially argued that all liabilities were transferred to the Kenyan Republic upon independence in 1963 and that it could not be held liable now.

But in 2011, the High Court ruled the claimants - Paulo Muoka Nzili, Wambuga Wa Nyingi and Jane Muthoni Mara - did have "arguable cases in law".

Their lawyers allege that Mr Nzili was castrated, Mr Nyingi was severely beaten and Mrs Mara was subjected to appalling sexual abuse in detention camps during the rebellion. A fourth claimant, Ndiku Mutwiwa Mutua, died earlier this year.

After the 2011 ruling, the case went back to the High Court in July to consider a claim by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) that the actions had been brought outside the legal time limit.

The FCO said it faced "irredeemable difficulties" in relation to the availability of witnesses and documents.

But on Friday, Mr Justice McCombe ruled the victims had established a proper case for the court to exercise its discretion and allowed their claims to proceed to trial.

A lawyer for the three said that the judgement meant the government would now face potentially thousands of claims from Kenyans who suffered similar torture.

Martyn Day said: "This is a historic judgement which will reverberate around the world and will have repercussions for years to come. "The British government has admitted that these three Kenyans were brutally tortured by the British colony and yet they have been hiding behind technical legal defences for three years in order to avoid any legal responsibility.

This was always morally repugnant and today the judge has also rejected these arguments." He added: "Following this judgement we can but hope that our government will at last do the honourable thing and sit down and resolve these claims.

There will undoubtedly be victims of colonial torture from Malaya to the Yemen, from Cyprus to Palestine, who will be reading this judgement with great care."

The BBC's Gabriel Gatehouse, in the Kenyan capital Nairobi, says there is jubilation among about 50 Mau Mau veterans gathered outside the Kenyan Human Rights Commission. They see the judgement as a significant victory, he says.

When the news came through from London there were immediate cheers and people started dancing, ululating and shouting, our correspondent says.

A spokesman for the FCO said the judgement had "potentially significant and far-reaching legal implications". "

The normal time limit for bringing a civil action is three to six years.

In this case that period has been extended to over 50 years despite the fact that the key decision-makers are dead and unable to give their account of what happened," the spokesman said. "Since this is an important legal issue, we have taken the decision to appeal.

In light of the legal proceedings it would not be appropriate for the government to comment any further on the detail of the case."

The spokesman reiterated that the government did not dispute that each of the claimants suffered torture at the hands of colonial forces.

"We have always said that we understand the pain and grievance felt by those, on all sides, who were involved in the divisive and bloody events of the emergency period in Kenya, and it is right that those who feel they have a case are free to take it to the courts," he said.

Source: BBC NEWS

See Also :

No comments: