Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Philippines : Women in Revolution: Maria Lorena Barros and MAKIBAKA



Laurie died in battle in 1976, but her spirit and her ideals live on. MAKIBAKA espouses  liberation in the context of the national liberation struggle... the full liberation of women will come when the Filipino people will have overthrown the yoke of imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism.

By CONI K. LEDESMA
International Spokesperson
Malayang Kilusan ng Bagong Kababaihan (MAKIBAKA)
22 March 2015
Utrecht, the Netherlands

Good afternoon, dear sisters, comrades and friends.


My talk this afternoon will focus on a Filipina revolutionary and her contribution to the national democratic movement, and the women's movement as a whole. I will talk about Maria Lorena Barros or Laurie, as she was popularly known.

Laurie was an anthropology student at the University of the Philippines in the mid 1960s. This was the time when students became aware of the political situation in the country, and imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism were recognized as the basic problems of Philippine society.

This was the period of political awakening of the Filipino people, when widespread protests in Metro Manila against the administration of Ferdinand Marcos were taking place. The nationalist struggle had been dormant since the 1950s. This ferment would lead to a frenzy of organizing among students, community youth, workers and farmers. Students and workers demonstrated against the Marcos government and exposed the basic problems of the Filipino people.

There were demonstrations against the raising of tuition fees, support for workers on strike, and demonstrations against the Vietnam war. Police brutality in response to the demonstrations resulted in more demonstrations.

Student organizations like the Kabataang Makabayan (KM, Patriotic Youth) and other organizations drew in men and women into their organizations.

It was during this period that Laurie became a student activist.

As Laurie got more deeply involved as an activist, she and other women began to discuss the role of women in the national democratic struggle. The youth organizations, like Kabataang Makabayan, had a women's bureau. But Laurie and the other women activists saw the need for a specific organization for women in order to fight not only against imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism, but also to fight for women's emancipation and to draw in women – who hold up half the sky – to participate in the struggle.

Theoretical and concrete practical work related to women's issues were very limited in the other organizations. Laurie saw the importance of a women's organization to define the role of women in the struggle and to draw in the largest participation of women.

Initially, the need for establishing a women’s organization separate from the youth organizations was questioned, saying that such an organization would divide the ranks.

However, Laurie clarified the ideological line, saying that a woman’s organization would specifically address the women’s issues in a semi-feudal, semi-colonial and patriarchal Philippine society.

Through a women's organization, the women’s struggle would become ideologically more revolutionary than their precursors, in that they would fight not only against Marcos, but also address the structural inequality in Philippine society.

A women's organization was important because it would articulate the women’s question within the broader framework of national and class oppression. In addition, it would draw in and organize women into the ranks of the revolutionary forces.

In April 1970, an all women's group called Malayang Kilusan ng Bagong Kababihan (Free Movement of New Women) or MAKIBAKA was born. Laurie was its Founding Chairperson.
The establishment of MAKIBAKA is a major landmark in the history of the women's movement in the Philippines. It articulated the oppression suffered by women and the need for women's liberation through participation in the nationalist struggle.

MAKIBAKA brought together women activists who espoused women's liberation in the context of national liberation. Women from various national democratic organizations joined MAKIBAKA.
MAKIBAKA's first all-women activity was a picket of a major beauty contest. This initial activity was significant not only because it was an all women's activity, but because it raised for the first time a woman-specific issue – the commodification of women through beauty contests. This was a concern never before addressed by the national democratic movement.

As MAKIBAKA developed, so too their activities. There was the picket of the UP Corps of Sponsors to protest the militarization of the University campus, the establishment of the National Democratic Nursery and the Mothers’ Corps, and the support for the worker’s strike at the US Tobacco Corporation. The members also held teach-ins and discussion groups where they discussed national and women’s issues, visited political prisoners, paid homage to revolutionary martyrs, and rallied against the high prices. During this time, Lorena was writing essays and short articles on the women’s situation and the emancipation of women.

In the two and a half years of its existence before the declaration of Martial Law by the late Dictator Ferdinand Marcos, MAKIBAKA membership grew. Women became conscious of their double oppression, and experienced the liberating effects of participating in a national struggle as they involved themselves in performing general and specific tasks for the revolution.

Why is the founding of MAKIBAKA an important milestone in the history of the women's movement in the Philippines?

Our history tells us that from as far back as during Spanish colonization, into American colonization and the Japanese invasion of the Philippines, women have participated in the struggles for national liberation. We have great women like Gabriela Silang who, when her husband was killed in battle, took his place and led her troops in the war against Spain.

There were the women of Samar who, during the Philippine-American war, danced and flirted with the American soldiers, getting them drunk, and then that night, together with their male comrades, killed all the American soldiers.

There was Joey Guerrero, a woman who had leprosy, who used her illness to slip through Japanese lines to bring messages and food to the guerrilla fighters.

So why is MAKIBAKA a major landmark in the history of the women's movement in the Philippines? MAKIBAKA espouses women's liberation in the context of the national liberation struggle. It states that women not only suffer from the oppressive and exploitative situation of the country, but that women suffer the double oppression of gender oppression. And that the full liberation of women will only come when the Filipino people will have overthrown the yoke of imperialism, feudalism and bureaucrat capitalism. Its main task is to draw in as many women to the revolution.

Laurie used to say, “The Filipino woman's place is in the struggle”. This is quite unlike the old saying, “The woman's place is in the home”!

When the Dictator Marcos declared Martial Law in September 1972, MAKIBAKA members, as well as activists and members of various national democratic organizations, went underground. That means, activists went out of sight. But this did not mean they went into hiding and just hid. Many, including Laurie, went to the countryside and joined the New People's Army. Out of sight of the fascist military, the women and men of the national democratic movement continued to organize and the national democratic movement grew in leaps and bounds.

In October 1973, a year after Martial Law was declared, Laurie was arrested, tortured and imprisoned. While in prison, she learned that her husband, and the father of her son, had surrendered to the Marcos military. Sometime later, she escaped from prison together with five other companions and rejoined the New People's Army in the area where her husband had been active before he surrendered. This was her wish: That she would take his place and fight in his stead.

On March 24,1976, an encounter took place and Laurie was wounded. She ordered her other companions to retreat while she covered for them. The story is that when the soldiers came to her, she tried to shoot them but her gun jammed. She is supposed to have said, “You are lucky gentlemen, my gun jammed.”

Laurie died in battle in 1976. But her spirit and her ideals live on. MAKIBAKA, which went underground with the declaration of Martial Law, became one of the founding organizations of the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. It is a very active organization in the NDFP.

Most of its members are peasant women in the countryside. But there are also MAKIBAKA members in the cities, among women's organizations, and in the communities. In places where MAKIBAKA members are, they awaken the consciousness of women to the analysis of Philippine society, the double oppression they suffer as women, and enjoin them to participate in the struggle to liberate themselves. MAKIBAKA defines the women's movement in the Philippines as distinct but integral part to the national democratic movement.

Let me conclude my talk with a quote from the writings of Laurie Barros:

“The new woman, the new Filipina, is first and foremost a militant.
The new Filipina is one who can stay whole days and nights with striking workers, learning from them the social realities which her bourgeois education has kept from her. She is a woman who has discovered the exalting realm of responsibility, a woman fully engaged in the making of history. No longer is she a woman for marriage, but more and more a woman for action.”
 
Today, MAKIBAKA continues to live the dream of Maria Lorena Barros.

Thank you.

Sunday, March 22, 2015

"You can pick all the flowers, but you will never be able to stop the advance of spring." March 23rd 2015 Indefinite Hunger Strike begins by Maoist Political Prisoners in Morocco


                                                         Moroccan Spring Flowers


Communicated to the national and international opinion,indefinite hunger strike conducted by the group of political prisoners and Aziz Aziz Elkhalfawi Elbour, in local prisons Boulmharez and Oudaia Marrakech

We continue our struggle in local prisons Boulmharez and Oudaia Marrakech against catastrophic realities in which we live and to face the systematic refusal of the prison administration to meet our claims made, and despite several hunger strikes that we conducted.

We also denounce harassment and daily threats we face every day inside our prisons - whether in the form of insults, bullying, physical assault made by guards, officials, directors and presidents of our prisons.

We  Maoist political prisoners have decided to engage in a new stage of resistance by conducting a fresh indefinite hunger strike for the group of Aziz Elkhalfawi and another three days for the group of renewable Aziz Elbour if necessary.

These strikes will begin Monday, March 23, 2015 in memory of the glorious uprising of March 23, 1965; and there, we seek to impose our just and legitimate demands within the prison.

Our demands are:


Our release and that of all political prisoners unconditionally

The abandonment of the charges and proceedings from scratch mounted against us

The dropping of charges against our comrades unconditionally

The abandonment of the University of militarization and the complete abandonment of the Tripartite circular.-

Authorization of access for our families, for students and for all those who want to visit us throughout the week.- I

Improving diets, the right and access to care, health and hygiene

The provision of books and free access to reference books, newspapers and all that contribute to the study.-

Authorization to enroll in bachelor's, master's and the vocational license.-

Authorization of a free phone use to communicate with the outside.-

Authorization for walks on adequate and proper time.

consolidation of political prisoners in one prison and in the same cells.-

The end of harassment and all measures having abuses we face everyday.Finally, we report on a national and international opinion our full solidarity:-

With all the struggles of the Moroccan people in all its components (workers, peasants, students, pupils, unemployed ...).-

With all political prisoners throughout the country and abroad.

We strongly condemn:

- Repression and solitary confinement experienced by our families, the National Union of Students of Morocco, activists of the movement of February 20 and all democratic activists.

- Abuses and restrictions faced by union and political freedoms in Morocco.

Finally, we declare our determination to continue the struggle inside prison by all means at our disposal to achieve our true and accurate claims and we bear full responsibility for what may happen to us in prison management and the reactionary regime.

"You can pick all the flowers, but you will never be able to stop the advance of spring."

LONG LIVE THE STRUGGLE OF STUDENT MOVEMENT!

LONG LIVE THE MOROCCAN REVOLUTION!

Long live the World proletarian revolution.

LONG LIVE MARXISM-LENINISM-MAOISM!

Signatories:

Group Aziz Elkhalfawi:Aziz Elkhalfawi - n ° 2375 (Oudaia)Radwan Aladimi - n ° 2376 (Ouadhias)Group Aziz Elbour:Aziz Elbour - n ° 12679 (Tiznit prison)Mohammed Almouaddine - n ° 21409 (Boulmharez)Hicham Almiskini - No. 21 415 (Boulmharez)Abdelhak Atalhaoui - No. 21 853 (Boulmharez)Marrakesh, 21/03/2015

Democracy and Class Struggle appeals to comrades to support our Moroccan Brothers and Sisters.



Saturday, March 21, 2015

India: The CPI (Maoist) sees new opportunities to advance Protracted People’s War with the Central Government pursuing pro-imperialist and ‘country-selling’ policies at a faster pace and also advancing a Hindu-fascist agenda in various forms.


CPI (Maoist) general secretary Ganapathy, in an interview to Maoist Information Bulletin (MIB), a copy of which is with Express, spoke of the challenges his party has to overcome and on a host of other issues.
“After coming to power, the BJP is implementing pro-imperialist, country-selling policies at a break-neck pace catering to the needs of foreign and Indian big capitalists and big landlords while, at the same time, advancing the Hindu-fascist agenda in various forms.


Thus, there is need for uniting all democratic, progressive, secular and patriotic forces. Newer and more numerous classes, social sections, forces of society will be brought into the arena of struggle, and new opportunities for advancing the PPW will open up.“The situation around the world is becoming increasingly favourable for a revolution. “The imperialist world economy is still reeling under a serious crisis and all  fundamental contradictions in the world are sharpening.

Consequently, the revolutionary, democratic and national liberation forces all over the world are gaining strength against imperialism and its domestic props. Maoist forces too are consolidating.”

On the party’s plan to accelerate development of PLGA and intensification of guerilla warfare, Ganapathy said, “As the enemy employs some counter-tactics, a new situation arises. So, we will have to adopt tactics that will give us the advantage, to counter the superior forces of the enemy with guerilla warfare and by mobilising people. A crucial factor in building up and developing the guerilla war will be the deepening of our mass base.”
On the need for Bolshevisation Campaign, the Maoist top leader said his party had issued a call in 2013 to Bolshevise the party and it was being carried out in the party, PLGA and mass organisations now. “It would take some more time to complete it and only then can we assess the success of re-moulding our party into a Bolshevised party.”

It was CPSU(B), popularly known as the Russian Bolshevik Party, that overthrew the bourgeois class and established proletarian dictatorship for the first time. When no Communist party was in power in the world, this was the party that brought the working class and the toiling masses to power.

 t was the Bolshevik party that ushered in Socialism for the first time in the history of humanity. So we are taking this party as our model, and striving to turn our party into such a proletarian party by learning lessons from it and imbibing the qualities that made all this possible,” Ganapathy said, adding that was why it was named as Bolshevisation Campaign.

“On the other hand, the Chinese Communist Party model is also very important to Maoists because China and India have several similarities. It is necessary to know and imbibe the qualities of CPC that helped it make a successful revolution and build socialism in a semi-colonial, semi-feudal backward country where peasantry is the majority by developing the PPW line and building a people’s army, a successful united front and establishing liberated areas. CPC, since its formation, put continuous efforts to strengthen itself by taking CPSU(B) as a model.

“We decided to carry on this campaign, keeping in view the experiences of this party, particularly from the Great Debate and in the light of the lessons imparted by the GPCR. We would keep these two parties as the models in Bolshevising the party in the light of the experiences gained in the long revolutionary history of our party,” Ganapathy said.


SOURCE: https://revolutionaryfrontlines.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/india-protracted-peoples-war-at-hand-warns-top-maoist-cpi/#more-28806

Friday, March 20, 2015

Anvesha - New Delhi Forum on Fascism 13th March 2015 - A Report of Meeting by Kavita Krishnapallavi




The writers-artists-intellectuals will have to come forward and take all the risks of expression in order to push back the increasing threat of fascism

New Delhi, 14 March. The writers, journalists and cultural workers who gathered at a symposium organised by a pro-people forum ‘Anvesha’ reached on a consensus on the need that the writers-artists-intellectuals will have to come forward and take all the risks of expression in order to push back the increasing threat of fascism in the country.

With the assumption of power by Narendra Modi, while on the one hand the interest of ordinary people is being sacrificed to serve the interests native and foreign corporate houses, attempts are being made on the other hand to divide people through the communal campaigns such as ‘love jihad’ and ‘Ghar wapasi’ etc. and to poison the minds through the saffronisation of education and culture. A widespread and militant resistance is the need of the hour.

Poet Manglesh Dabral who chaired the symposium said that the ground for fascism has been prepared in the country ever since 1925 and after the victory of Narendra Modi, the Sangh Parivar has come to believe that now their time has come and hence their aggression is on rise.

A broad front consisting of all the leftist and pro-people writers-artists needs to be forged against this.

Now the stray actions of resistance is not enough. He said that there has been much depolitisation in the literary milieu of Hindi and it is our weakness. We need to take inspirations from the writers-artists throughout the world who fought against fascism despite being at the receiving end of barbaric attack.

Poetess Katyayani said that it is not a coincidence that in the last 25 years there has been an upsurge of the Hindutva fundamentalism and Islamic fundamentalism in response and in the same duration the neo-liberal economic policies have matured.

The fascist forces have managed to expand their mass base by posing an imaginary enemy before the common man who is shattered and perturbed by unemployment, inflation, anarchy and corruption caused by the economic crisis of the capitalist system and by presenting fake and simple solution to the problems.

In order to challenge them we too need to go to the ordinary people and expose the real character of fascists. Mere ritualistic protest activities among the middle class living in the metropolitan cities will not work, nor can their social base weaken by opposing them from the ground of ‘equal respect to all religions’.

We need to gain a correct ideological understanding of fascism. We have to understand the similarities and the differences between the fascism of the past which wrecked havoc in the world and the current fascism which we are witnessing today.

We need to understand that the earlier strategy of ‘popular front’ will not work today because none of the sections of the bourgeoisie today will stand along with us in a prolonged fight against fascism.

In order to fully understand the phenomenon of fascism, apart from the available Marxist writings we need to specifically read the writings of Bertolt Brecht, Walter Benjamin, Ernst Bloch and Adorno for improving our understanding of the ideological aspects of the cultural resistance against it.

Critic Vaibhav Singh said that the electoral democracy of India has been strengthening the foundation of the upsurge of fascist forces. What is needed today is a collective fight and the defense of each other’s commitment. The writers-intellectuals should not be under any illusion that those who are less political or less vocal would escape the attack of fascist forces.

Journalist Abhishek Srivastav said that we have to examine as to why the fascist forces managed to bring a substantial section of the Indian population to their fold. An effective fight against fascism can be waged only after understanding the relation between the financial crisis and fascist upsurge and the politics and culture of fascism.

Journalist Panini Anand said that continuous attempts are being made by the fascist forces to deprave, deviate and purchase those who are opposing them. We not only need to focus on preventing the attacks on people but also on the weaknesses and opportunism arising in our midst and we need to draw a clear dividing line.

Kavita Krishnapallavi, the convenor of ‘Anvesha’, said while introducing the subject that the new upsurge of fascism is not just a repetition of the fascism of the third-fourth decade of the last century.

Since capitalism today is passing through a phase of prolonged recession which is marked by partial revival followed by severe crisis, the dividing line between bourgeois democracy and the naked ultra-rightist bourgeois dictatorship is somewhat getting blurred and the societies spanning from advance capitalist USA to the backward capitalist India are increasingly becoming fertile ground for the rise and growth of fascist organisations and fascist movements.

The question of pushing back the Hindutvaite forces is not a question of electoral victory-defeat. It is an ultra-reactionary socio-political movement which has been built through a cadre-based fascist organisational machinery. The fight against it will be a long one. We will have to counter them at the cultural front through regular cultural activities, alternative cultural institutions and various art forms and we will have to abandon the ritualistic and defensive attitude.

Critic Ashutosh Kumar said that the current fascist upsurge is the ruling class’s immediate solution not just to the crisis of the corporate capital but also to the crisis arising out of the struggles for social and gender justice. Their success is largely due to the failure of the class struggles and the struggles for social and gender justice to unite.

A joint front of these three kinds of movements is needed to defeat fascism. The challenge before us is what would be the theoretical basis for any such front.

Poet Ranjeet Verma said that Mussolini had termed fascism as a consequence of the nexus between corporate capital and state power. This is clearly visible after the assumption of power by Narendra Modi. It is to serve their interest that today attempts to divide people in the name of religion, caste, region are on full swing, we need to stand united against them.

Journalist Amlendu Upadhyay said that we need to see that the current fascist upsurge is closely linked with identity politics.

In fact, the Hindutvaite politics in India has carved its place by riding on the back of identity politics.

Today while opposing the land grab law of Modi government we must not forget what kind of tactics were used by Mayawati government in Uttar Pradesh to grab the land from farmers for the benefit of industrialists and builders.

Vineet Tiwari from Madhya Pradesh stressed on the need to forge a broad front against fascism. Referring to the recent murder of Govind Pansare and widespread protest against it he said that mere tokenism is not enough to counter fascism, we need to form a collective cultural strategy of militant struggle.

Anand Singh, member of Anvesha’s convening body, said while discussing the history of the upsurge of fascism that the crisis of financial capital and the falling rate of profit has been forcing the capitalist class to go for the alternative of an authoritarian rule which could serve its interest by crushing all its opposition.

The coming into power of Modi government in India needs to be looked in relation to this crisis only. If we are to wage a resilient fight against fascism we need to have a clear vision on its ideological aspects as well.

Copious writings are available on fascism from Marxist viewpoint, whose reading will help us to devise a correct strategy. We must study the writings of Gramsci, Togliatti, Dimitrov, Lukacs, Clara Zetkin, Rabinbach, Kunhl, Kurt Gossweiler, Mical Kalecki, Tim Mason etc on fascism.

Lata Kumari from JNU while presenting various examples of the militant struggles by poets-artists against the dictatorial rules in Latin America stressed on the need to build a strong cultural movement in India as well which should have links to people. Sudeep Sahu from Ghaziabad also expressed his views.

Satyam, who moderated the symposium, said that the crisis of capitalist system today is causing the upsurge of the neo-fascist political forces in several countries including Greece, Ukraine, Italy and USA as also the emergence of goonda gangs such as Boko Haram, IS and Hindutvaites.

 With the deepening of this crisis the acts of arson and vandalism by these forces will increase even in India.

 Those participating in the symposium included senior poet and journalist Vishnu Nagar, Ramji Rai of Jan Sanskriti Manch, R. Chetankranti, Nityanand Gayen and various young cultural workers and social activists.

The presidium consisted of Manglesh Dabral, Katyayani, Ranjeet Verma and Abhishek Srivastava.

Kavita Krishnapallavi
On behalf of Anvesha

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Washington’s War on Russia by Mike Whitney

Democracy and Class Struggle welcomes this article by Mike Whitney as it amongst other things it points to the critical importance of the speech of George Freidman of Stratfor at the Chicago Council on Global Affairs - a speech we have alerted our readers too.
 
However this article fails to mention a critical admission at that meeting that the Intermarium is now part of the official strategy of US imperialism regarding Eastern Europe and its re-shaping in the years ahead.
 
This has usually been publically denied by US policy makers and this is first public admission that this is now US Eastern European strategy with all the consequences that follow from that strategy to the detriment of Russia and in our view to Germany and rest of Europe in the coming years.
 
 
 
                                             US to support creation of the Intermarium
 
 
 
“In order to survive and preserve its leading role on the international stage, the US desperately needs to plunge Eurasia into chaos, (and) to cut economic ties between Europe and Asia-Pacific Region … Russia is the only (country) within this potential zone of instability that is capable of resistance. It is the only state that is ready to confront the Americans. Undermining Russia’s political will for resistance… is a vitally important task for America.”
-Nikolai Starikov, Western Financial System Is Driving It to War, Russia Insider

“Our first objective is to prevent the re-emergence of a new rival, either on the territory of the former Soviet Union or elsewhere, that poses a threat on the order of that posed formerly by the Soviet Union. This is a dominant consideration underlying the new regional defense strategy and requires that we endeavor to prevent any hostile power from dominating a region whose resources would, under consolidated control, be sufficient to generate global power.”

-The Wolfowitz Doctrine, the original version of the Defense Planning Guidance, authored by Under Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, leaked to the New York Times on March 7, 1992

The United States does not want a war with Russia, it simply feels that it has no choice.

If the State Department hadn’t initiated a coup in Ukraine to topple the elected president, Viktor Yanukovych, then the US could not have inserted itself between Russia and the EU, thus, disrupting vital trade routes which were strengthening nations on both continents.

The economic integration of Asia and Europe–including plans for high-speed rail from China (“The New Silk Road”) to the EU–poses a clear and present danger for the US whose share of global GDP continues to shrink and whose significance in the world economy continues to decline.

For the United States to ignore this new rival (EU-Russia) would be the equivalent of throwing in the towel and accepting a future in which the US would face a gradual but persistent erosion of its power and influence in world affairs. No one in Washington is prepared to let that happen, which is why the US launched its proxy-war in Ukraine.

The US wants to separate the continents, “prevent the emergence of a new rival”, install a tollbooth between Europe and Asia, and establish itself as the guarantor of regional security. To that end, the US is rebuilding the Iron Curtain along a thousand mile stretch from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea.

Tanks, armored vehicles and artillery are being sent to the region to reinforce a buffer zone around Europe in order to isolate Russia and to create a staging ground for future US aggression. Reports of heavy equipment and weapons deployment appear in the media on nearly a daily basis although the news is typically omitted in the US press. A quick review of some of the recent headlines will help readers to grasp the scale of the conflict that is cropping up below the radar:
“US, Bulgaria to hold Balkans military drills”, “NATO Begins Exercises In Black Sea”, “Army to send even more troops, tanks to Europe”, “Poland requests greater US military presence”, “U.S. Army sending armored convoy 1,100 miles through Europe”, “Over 120 US tanks, armored vehicles arrive in Latvia”, “US, Poland to Conduct Missile Exercise in March – Pentagon”
Get the picture? There’s a war going on, a war between the United States and Russia.

Notice how most of the headlines emphasize US involvement, not NATO.

In other words, the provocations against Russia originate from Washington not Europe. This is an important point. The EU has supported US-led economic sanctions, but it’s not nearly as supportive of the military build up along the perimeter.

That’s Washington’s idea and the cost is borne by the US alone. Naturally, moving tanks, armored vehicles and artillery around the world is an expensive project, but the US is more than willing to make the sacrifice if it helps to achieve its objectives.

And what are Washington’s objectives?

Interestingly, even political analysts on the far right seem to agree about that point. For example, check out this quote from STRATFOR CEO George Friedman who summed it up in a recent presentation he delivered at The Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs. He said:
“The primordial interest of the United States, over which for centuries we have fought wars–the First, the Second and Cold Wars–has been the relationship between Germany and Russia, because united there, they’re the only force that could threaten us. And to make sure that that doesn’t happen.” … George Friedman at The Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs, Time 1:40 to 1:57)
Bingo. Ukraine has nothing to do with sovereignty, democracy or (alleged) Russian aggression. That’s all propaganda. It’s about power. It’s about imperial expansion. It’s about spheres of influence. It’s about staving off irreversible economic decline. It’s all part of the smash-mouth, scorched earth, take-no-prisoners geopolitical world in which we live, not the fake Disneyworld created by the western media.

The US State Department and CIA toppled the elected-government in Ukraine and ordered the new junta regime to launch a desperate war of annihilation against its own people in the East, because, well, because they felt they had no other option.

Had Putin’s ambitious plan to create a free trade zone between Lisbon to Vladivostok gone forward, then where would that leave the United States? Out in the cold, that’s where. The US would become an isolated island of dwindling significance whose massive account deficits and ballooning national debt would pave the way for years of brutal restructuring, declining standards of living, runaway inflation and burgeoning social unrest.

Does anyone really believe that Washington would let that to happen when it has a “brand-spanking” trillion dollar war machine at its disposal?

Heck, no. Besides, Washington believes it has a historic right to rule the world, which is what one would expect when the sense of entitlement and hubris reach their terminal phase. Now check out this clip from an article by economist Jack Rasmus at CounterPunch:
“Behind the sanctions is the USA objective of driving Russia out of the European economy. Europe was becoming too integrated and dependent on Russia. Not only its gas and raw materials, but trade relations and money capital flows were deepening on many fronts between Russia and Europe in general prior to the Ukraine crisis that has provided the cover for the introduction of the sanctions. Russia’s growing economic integration with Europe threatened the long term economic interests of US capitalists. Strategically, the US precipitated coup in the Ukraine can be viewed, therefore as a means by which to provoke Russian military intervention, i.e. a necessary event in order to deepen and expand economic sanctions that would ultimately sever the growing economic ties between Europe and Russia long term. That severance in turn would not only ensure US economic interests remain dominant in Europe, but would also open up new opportunities for profit making for US interests in Europe and Ukraine as well…
When the rules of the competition game between capitalists break down altogether, the result is war—i.e. the ultimate form of inter-capitalist competition.” (The Global Currency Wars, Jack Rasmus, CounterPunch)
See? Analysts on the right and left agree. Ukraine has nothing to do with sovereignty, democracy or Russian aggression. It’s plain-old cutthroat geopolitics, where the last man left standing, wins.

The United States cannot allow Russia reap the benefits of its own vast resources.

Oh, no. It has to be chastised, it has to be bullied, it has to be sanctioned, isolated, threatened and intimidated.

That’s how the system really works. The free market stuff is just horsecrap for the sheeple.

Russia is going to have to deal with chaotic, fratricidal wars on its borders and color-coded regime change turbulence in its capital. It will have to withstand reprisals from its trading partners, attacks on its currency and plots to eviscerate its (oil) revenues.

The US will do everything in its power to poison the well, to demonize Putin, to turn Brussels against Moscow, and to sabotage the Russian economy.

Divide and conquer, that’s the ticket. Keep them at each others throats at all times. Sunni vs Shia, one ethnic Ukrainian vs the other, Russians vs Europeans. That’s Washington’s plan, and it’s a plan that never fails.

US powerbrokers are convinced that America’s economic slide can only be arrested by staking a claim in Central Asia, dismembering Russia, encircling China, and quashing all plans for an economically-integrated EU-Asia. Washington is determined to prevail in this existential conflict, to assert its hegemonic control over the two continents, and to preserve its position as the world’s only superpower.

Only Russia can stop the United States and we believe it will.

MIKE WHITNEY lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press). Hopeless is also available in a Kindle edition. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com.

Source: http://www.counterpunch.org/2015/03/18/washingtons-war-on-russia/

SEE ALSO:

http://democracyandclasstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-empire-of-lies.html

http://democracyandclasstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/usa-inside-mind-of-evil-empire-george.html

Wednesday, March 18, 2015

Red Salute to Blockupy and comrades from Democracy and Class Struggle for crashing European Central Bank opening party : Frankfurt leads the way - Resistance to European Central Bank Celebratory Party - Smash the ECB !



 
Red Salute to Blockupy and comrades from Democracy and Class Struggle for crashing European Central Bank opening party and exposing their crimes in Europe including responsibility for 5000 suicides in Greece and uncounted numbers elsewhere as a result of the European Central Bank  austerity policies.

The Structural violence of the European Central Bank has been met with the justified anger of the People.

Smash the ECB !


Dozens of people have been hurt and some 350 people arrested as anti-austerity demonstrators clashed with police in the German city of Frankfurt.

Police cars were set alight and stones were thrown in a protest against the opening of a new base for the European Central Bank (ECB).

Violence broke out close to the city's Alte Oper concert hall hours before the ECB building's official opening.







 
European Central Bank under Siege by Comrades
 
 
Some 10,000 anti-austerity protesters have gathered in Frankfurt, Germany, as the European Central Bank opens its building in the city. An earlier stand-off between the protesters and police resulted in clashes, with tear gas and water cannons deployed after the demonstrators torched several cars and put tires on fire. Both sides report injuries. Some 350 people have been detained

 
 
 

Frankfurt leads the way - Resistance to European Central Bank Celebratory Party - Smash the ECB !



 
Red Salute to Blockupy and comrades from Democracy and Class Struggle for crashing European Central Bank opening party and exposing their crimes in Europe including responsibility for 5000 suicides in Greece and uncounted numbers elsewhere as a result of the European Central Bank  austerity policies.

The Structural violence of the European Central Bank has been met with the justified anger of the People.

Smash the ECB !


Dozens of people have been hurt and some 350 people arrested as anti-austerity demonstrators clashed with police in the German city of Frankfurt.

Police cars were set alight and stones were thrown in a protest against the opening of a new base for the European Central Bank (ECB).

Violence broke out close to the city's Alte Oper concert hall hours before the ECB building's official opening.







 
European Central Bank under Siege by Comrades
 
 
Some 10,000 anti-austerity protesters have gathered in Frankfurt, Germany, as the European Central Bank opens its building in the city. An earlier stand-off between the protesters and police resulted in clashes, with tear gas and water cannons deployed after the demonstrators torched several cars and put tires on fire. Both sides report injuries. Some 350 people have been detained

 
 
 
 

Tuesday, March 17, 2015

India: Jaison C. Cooper and Thushar Sarathy released from prison

 
See Also:

http://democracyandclasstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/india-amnesty-international-adds-its.html

Democracy and Class Struggle offers a Red Salute to two brave comrades - true sons of India in the tradition of Bhagat Singh
Jaison C. Cooper and Thushar Sarathy

CONDITIONS OF THEIR RELEASE INCLUDE:

1. They can't leave Kerala without permission. 2. They are forbidden to leave India. 3. They have to check in weekly at the local police station. 4. They can't commit such crimes again. 5. They must cooperate with the on going investigation of ...them. 

This clearly leaves the authorities a lot of wiggle room to re-imprison them at the drop of a hat, so we must remain vigilant.





The Empire of Lies and the truth of the Intermarium



                                                                 Intermarium


The US Empire routinely lies and as Lenin perceptively remarked deception and self deception are the hallmarks of bourgeois politics.

Well what about the truth - well we have recently published George Freidman of Stratfor  stating that Reagans policy of supplying both sides during the Iran Iraq war in which a million people died is something to be emulated.

George Freidman also announced that the Pilsudski dream of Intermarium - a new confederation from the Baltic to the Black Sea is the US Strategy for Eastern Europe to keep Germany and Russia apart for this century.

                                                        Zbigniew Brzezinski


Doubtless this came from the same mind - the mind of Zbigniew Brzezinski who said what's the problem with a few riled up muslims if it brought down the Soviet State in the 1990's

Zbigniew Brzezinski's riled up muslims are now part of  creation of the US Empires 100 years War in the Middle East based on the Iraq/Iran Reaganite model of mutual slaughter.

But that was not enough for Zbigniew Brzezinski he has to live the dream of Pilsudski and create another 100 years war in Europe with the re shaping of Eastern Europe into the Intermarium from the Baltic to the Black Sea.

Brzezinski talks about an "ambiguous " conflict in Belarus.

In the, The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski  declared that “a more decentralized Russia would be less susceptible to imperial mobilization.”

Hence, he called for Russia to be transformed into a “loosely confederated” alliance “composed of a European Russia, a Siberian Republic, and a Far Eastern Republic.”

Brzezinski also urged that America surround Russia — or, rather, the Russias — with a pack of smaller states to hem it in.

Russia faces an existential threat from the likes of Brzezinski who represents the hubris of the US Empire combined with a self destructive Pilsudski version of Polish Nationalism - a lethal combination for US and Poland..





Monday, March 16, 2015

Russia : Putin is back - Western Media Frenzy Exposed

 
 
Putin met his Kyrgyz counterpart Almazbek Atambayev on Monday in his first public meeting open to the press since March 5.
 
Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov mocked all the rumors about his boss’s alleged disappearance.

“Have you seen the president [Putin] crushed with paralysis and captured by the generals?" Peskov asked the journalists, smiling,” [He] just arrived from Switzerland where he was delivering babies, as you know.”

When a representative of western media asked Peskov about a foreign doctor arriving to Russian President, the spokesman said the doctor in question “was among the generals who captured Putin.”
The Kremlin is not going to comment on Putin’s state of health, Peskov said Monday.

“We’ve said 10 times, we can’t comment anymore,” he told journalists, adding that the more comments that are released, the more fantastic theories are being invented.


 
Democracy and Class Struggle would have seen Putin's neutralisation by pro West forces a set back for the anti Hegemonic struggle against the evil US Empire.
 
Concerning the social character of Russian State - we do not see Russia, because it is principally and economically a raw materials producer and also as a very small finance capital sector as a, newly developed finance capitalist Imperialist State.
 
However we do not rule out that developmental possibility in the coming decades..
  
We are also cognisant of Comrade Lenin's remarks in his study of Imperialism in which  he quoted the question of Japan, that nationalist ideology can form basis for Imperialism and not just Finance Capital..
 
Therefore our views on Russia are not cast in stone but will develop has we deepen our understanding of the nature of Russian Capitalism as it proceeds in the 21st Century..
 
FOR FURTHER STUDY READ :

    
Our Sister site Political Economy Research is publishing an extract from an article called Is Russia Imperialist ? from a Blog called Critique of Crisis Theory run by Sam Williams, the full article which we recommend you read in full is here http://critiqueofcrisistheory.wordpress.com/is-russia-imperialist/

We have republished the part of the article dealing with Finance Capital has this has been seen has critical for understanding Imperialism but we are particularly grateful to Sam Williams for pointing out that Lenin saw Japan has Imperialist despite its lack of finance capital.

Please see article on Japanese Imperialism here:

http://democracyandclassstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/explanations-of-japans-imperialistic.html


For the contrary view that Russia is Imperialist read Michael Pröbsting  here :
http://democracyandclassstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/russia-its-monopoly-capital-and-its.html
 
FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF THE NOTION OF SUB-IMPERIALISM VISIT HERE:

http://democracyandclassstruggle.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=sub+imperialism