Let us grasp the teachings of the
proletariat, let us strengthen our efforts for the reconstitution of the
Communist Party of Germany
We publish a Statement of the
Editorial Staff of the Magazine Klassenstandpunkt on the occasion of 100 years
of the November Revolution.
Let us grasp the teachings of the proletariat, let us strengthen our efforts for the reconstitution of the Communist Party of Germany
This year
is the 100th anniversary of one of the most important experiences in the
history of the proletariat in Germany – the November Revolution. One of the few
moments in the history of this country in which the working class reached for
the power and tried to end the exploitative and oppressive system of
imperialism. In the surge of the First World War, in which imperialism showed
for the first time on full scale its man-eating and destructive grotesque face
and the gigantic fratricide of the proletariat, it caused the working class in
Germany to rise up to end the slaughtering. Motivated by the conquer of power
by the proletariat in Tsarist Russia during the Great Socialist October
Revolution they tried to do it alike the Russian brothers and sisters in the
Soviets.
The imperialists trembled and the German revisionists – who had sealed their betrayal of the proletariat in 1914 with their approval of the massive slaughter – had to hatch various intrigues to steer the combatting ones onto a calm course. The November Revolution in the last analysis was not a victorious battle for proletariat in Germany on its path of socialism with shining communism as the goal. But the heroic fighters of the proletariat are indispensable part of the revolutionary history of our class, they uphold the slogan: It is right to rebel!
Now at the 100th anniversary of this great historic event besides the revisionists of all kinds, also bourgeois historians, liberals and even anarchists are throwing themselves at this part of our history. For this reason it is necessary to uphold, defend and apply the principals that were reaffirmed by the November Revolution to correspond to the requirements of revolution in the struggle of the proletarian revolutionaries in this country.
The imperialists trembled and the German revisionists – who had sealed their betrayal of the proletariat in 1914 with their approval of the massive slaughter – had to hatch various intrigues to steer the combatting ones onto a calm course. The November Revolution in the last analysis was not a victorious battle for proletariat in Germany on its path of socialism with shining communism as the goal. But the heroic fighters of the proletariat are indispensable part of the revolutionary history of our class, they uphold the slogan: It is right to rebel!
Now at the 100th anniversary of this great historic event besides the revisionists of all kinds, also bourgeois historians, liberals and even anarchists are throwing themselves at this part of our history. For this reason it is necessary to uphold, defend and apply the principals that were reaffirmed by the November Revolution to correspond to the requirements of revolution in the struggle of the proletarian revolutionaries in this country.
When the
sailors 100 years ago in the night of the 29th of October began their uprising
in front of Wilhelmshaven they were a few dozens and their action did not have
any immediate success. But the spark of their heroism lightened a prairie fire
which spread through the whole Germany.
A few days later the first soldier’s soviet was constituted in Kiel and 40.000 workers, sailors and soldiers took the city. In Bremen, Hamburg, Leipzig, Chemnitz, Munich and Gotha the workers and soldiers founded soviet republics, but they were not able to withstand reaction.
Even if the masses did not lack fighting spirit and because of the ongoing World War they did not lack weapons either, the proletariat did lack a very decisive thing to really be able to erect its dictatorship in Germany.
It was lacking leadership. Leadership in form of its organised vanguard, the Communist Party. In the evaluation of the Paris Commune Marx and Engels said:
A few days later the first soldier’s soviet was constituted in Kiel and 40.000 workers, sailors and soldiers took the city. In Bremen, Hamburg, Leipzig, Chemnitz, Munich and Gotha the workers and soldiers founded soviet republics, but they were not able to withstand reaction.
Even if the masses did not lack fighting spirit and because of the ongoing World War they did not lack weapons either, the proletariat did lack a very decisive thing to really be able to erect its dictatorship in Germany.
It was lacking leadership. Leadership in form of its organised vanguard, the Communist Party. In the evaluation of the Paris Commune Marx and Engels said:
“In its
struggle against the collective power of the propertied classes, the working
class cannot act as a class except by constituting itself into a political
party, distinct from, and opposed to all old parties formed by the propertied
classes.”1
The
experiences of the Paris Commune and their eternal principals converge above
all in this regard with those of the November Revolution in Germany. However,
the situation was a different one. The experiences of the Paris Commune lay
back over 50 years and were just implemented successfully in the October
Revolution. Through the First World War a revolutionary situation emerged not
only in Russia and Germany but it was also the case in other countries.
But most of the Parties of the II. International had degenerated, just like in Germany, into revisionist and social-chauvinist Parties. Despite the struggle of the left in the International Communist Movement against it, mainly embodied by the great Lenin. Therefore the leadership of the working class for the conquest of power was also non-existent in Germany at this moment. The Social-Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) had a big influence in the masses of the working class at this moment and was completely degenerated. For this reason it came to the split by the Independent Social-Democratic Party of Germany (USPD), although this was a combination of Bernsteinist Revisionist and proletarian revolutionaries – which were represented by the Group International (in German: Gruppe Internationale).
Thus, there was a lack of ideological clarity, i.e. Marxism and the contributions Lenin had made at this point, mainly in the struggle against revisionism. Also the Revolutionary Stewards, who forged plans for the conquest of power at a certain point, did not have the function of an acknowledged vanguard of the working class and they stayed in the USPD. The Communist Party of Germany was only founded on the 1st of January 1919 by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg.
Even after its foundation it was a far to young force in the January-Struggles that were breaking out shortly after and it had still to conquer the acknowledgement of the working class. The struggle of the Bolsheviks for a clandestine Party in Russia did not yet echo in Germany and therefore legalism was a still a wide spread phenomenon.
But most of the Parties of the II. International had degenerated, just like in Germany, into revisionist and social-chauvinist Parties. Despite the struggle of the left in the International Communist Movement against it, mainly embodied by the great Lenin. Therefore the leadership of the working class for the conquest of power was also non-existent in Germany at this moment. The Social-Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) had a big influence in the masses of the working class at this moment and was completely degenerated. For this reason it came to the split by the Independent Social-Democratic Party of Germany (USPD), although this was a combination of Bernsteinist Revisionist and proletarian revolutionaries – which were represented by the Group International (in German: Gruppe Internationale).
Thus, there was a lack of ideological clarity, i.e. Marxism and the contributions Lenin had made at this point, mainly in the struggle against revisionism. Also the Revolutionary Stewards, who forged plans for the conquest of power at a certain point, did not have the function of an acknowledged vanguard of the working class and they stayed in the USPD. The Communist Party of Germany was only founded on the 1st of January 1919 by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg.
Even after its foundation it was a far to young force in the January-Struggles that were breaking out shortly after and it had still to conquer the acknowledgement of the working class. The struggle of the Bolsheviks for a clandestine Party in Russia did not yet echo in Germany and therefore legalism was a still a wide spread phenomenon.
The
influence of the social-chauvinistic SPD was also expressed in the composition
of the newly founded soviets. In many of them but not nearly in all of them the
SPD had the majority. This demonstrates the meaning of the struggle against
revisionism – which led to the social-chauvinistic degeneration of the SPD – as
one of the most important tasks of the proletarian revolutionaries. Revisionism
is the bourgeoisie in the ranks of the working class, that is why it is the
main danger for the proletarian revolution.
Because it leads the revolution astray while it tries to maintain its revolutionary mask. If revisionism is not exposed permanently in front of the masses in theory and practice there is a danger that it wins or keeps influence in the masses.
This way it was possible that during the November Revolution scum like Ebert, Scheidemann and Noske had great influence in the soviets. Noske of all people, who had in January 1919 under his infamous remark “Someone has to be the bloodhound. I shall not shirk the responsibility.” rebels in Berlin slaughtered and who abandoned the trial against the murderers of Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg.
Because it leads the revolution astray while it tries to maintain its revolutionary mask. If revisionism is not exposed permanently in front of the masses in theory and practice there is a danger that it wins or keeps influence in the masses.
This way it was possible that during the November Revolution scum like Ebert, Scheidemann and Noske had great influence in the soviets. Noske of all people, who had in January 1919 under his infamous remark “Someone has to be the bloodhound. I shall not shirk the responsibility.” rebels in Berlin slaughtered and who abandoned the trial against the murderers of Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg.
After the
Paris Commune Marx and Engels came also to the conclusion:
“But the
working class cannot simply lay hold of the ready-made state machinery, and
wield it for its own purposes.”2
In the
course of the November Revolution the insurgents made the error to smash the
apparatus of the German state. Although the Emperor had to step down but the
whole machinery which keeps the state alive, the army of German public
officials was able to continue to work almost undisturbed. The bourgeoisie used
this to work towards establishing the SPD as the new governing watchdog.
Therefore the public officials worked towards the SPD and sabotaged the soviets
with the goal to erect a parliamentarian democracy and to take from the
insurgents the successes they had won in struggle. Today the international
proletariat knows better than ever that to build the New the Old has to be
destroyed. The New can not exist as a complement to the Old. When Lenin heard
the news of the sprouting soviet power in Germany he was full of excitement.
But after the defeat of the November Revolution he also analysed the problems
the communist had to struggle with back then:
“So far
as I can judge, the position of the Communist Party in Germany is a
particularly difficult one. This is understandable.
Firstly, and mainly, from the end of 1918, the international position of Germany very quickly and sharply aggravated her internal revolutionary crisis and impelled the vanguard of the proletariat towards an immediate seizure of power. At the same time, the German and the entire international bourgeoisie, excellently armed and organised, and taught by the “Russian experience”, hurled itself upon the revolutionary proletariat of Germany in a frenzy of hate. […] When the crisis broke out, however, the German workers lacked a genuine revolutionary party, owing to the fact that the split was brought about too late, and owing to the burden of the accursed tradition of “unity”with capital’s corrupt (the Scheidemanns, Legiens, Davids and Co.) and spineless (the Kautskys, Hilferdings and Co.) gang of lackeys.”3
Firstly, and mainly, from the end of 1918, the international position of Germany very quickly and sharply aggravated her internal revolutionary crisis and impelled the vanguard of the proletariat towards an immediate seizure of power. At the same time, the German and the entire international bourgeoisie, excellently armed and organised, and taught by the “Russian experience”, hurled itself upon the revolutionary proletariat of Germany in a frenzy of hate. […] When the crisis broke out, however, the German workers lacked a genuine revolutionary party, owing to the fact that the split was brought about too late, and owing to the burden of the accursed tradition of “unity”with capital’s corrupt (the Scheidemanns, Legiens, Davids and Co.) and spineless (the Kautskys, Hilferdings and Co.) gang of lackeys.”3
In
accordance to all of this the proletarian revolutionaries were not prepared for
the spontaneous armed insurgence of the masses. This is an important experience
of the proletarian revolutionaries in Germany today. Because it is not enough
to talk about preparation for it, in the moment the big struggles of the masses
are beginning, like some revisionists in this country still claim. One can not
begin to build a clandestine Party only when the armed struggle is initiated
but one has to prepare it and themselves. Like Marx said, one does not play
with the uprising, i.e. it is to be taken seriously and in which way it is done
better than in preparing the revolutionaries and the masses ideological,
political and organisational for it. Otherwise the developments of class
struggle sooner or later outdo the subjective forces of the proletarian
revolutionaries.
Well,
today the international proletariat has an even richer treasure of experiences
than in 1918. We are armed with the ideology of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism,
principally Maoism and the universally valid contributions of Chairman Gonzalo
i.e. Gonzalo Thought. We got as a part of it the universal military theory of
the proletariat, People’s War. Of course no one can blame the revolutionaries
and masses of 1918 for not having this mean, but the teachings we can draw from
the November Revolution, the principals that were confirmed then were
reaffirmed again and again. Therefore today we got an even more advanced
ideological foundation then ever before. What matters is to uphold, defend and
apply, principally apply it.
This way the proletarian revolutionaries in Germany are able to create the organisational foundations for the organised vanguard of the working class – for the reconstitution of the Communist Party of Germany – on a correct political line. Therefore all work of the proletarian revolutionaries in the FRG today has to aim at it, in the closest solidarity with the International Communist Movement – always upholding proletarian internationalism. To talk about of firstly winning over the masses and put the Party secondly is to turn the whole thing on its head and leads towards revisionist standpoints like quantity before quality. We would run the risk of becoming marsh inhabitants - to paraphrase Lenin. Therefore the 100th anniversary of the November Revolution is one reason more to raise the slogan: For the reconstitution of the Communist Party of Germany!
This way the proletarian revolutionaries in Germany are able to create the organisational foundations for the organised vanguard of the working class – for the reconstitution of the Communist Party of Germany – on a correct political line. Therefore all work of the proletarian revolutionaries in the FRG today has to aim at it, in the closest solidarity with the International Communist Movement – always upholding proletarian internationalism. To talk about of firstly winning over the masses and put the Party secondly is to turn the whole thing on its head and leads towards revisionist standpoints like quantity before quality. We would run the risk of becoming marsh inhabitants - to paraphrase Lenin. Therefore the 100th anniversary of the November Revolution is one reason more to raise the slogan: For the reconstitution of the Communist Party of Germany!
It is right to rebel!
Glory to the fallen heroes, long
live the revolution!
Editorial Staff of the Magazine Klassenstandpunkt
November 2018
Notes:
1 Marx and
Engels, “From the Resolutions of the General Congress held in The Hague”, 1872
2 Marx, ”The
Civil War in France”, 1871
3 Lenin,
“A letter to the German Communists”, 1921
No comments:
Post a Comment