Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Death Sentence Against Innocents - Execution announced by Indian State Terrorists - Act Now !


On 21st May 1991 the IndianPrime Minister Rajiv Gandhi was killed by a suicide bomber as he was speaking to an election rally in Sriperumbudur in Tamil Nadu. Within three weeks, the Indian intelligence service concluded that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam (LTTE) were responsible and cited the 1987 agreement between the Indian and Sri Lankan Government, and the resulting Indian military intervention in Sri Lanka as the motive for the assassination. Following the Indian military intervention in Sri Lanka, numerous innocent Tamils were killed and countless women were raped.

Of course, there was an obvious aim behind the assassination of the prime minister. Regardless of the fact that Rajiv Ghandi and his military committed war crimes and murders during the intervention, killing is not the ultimate solution. Even though there was a strong chance for the emergence of a people’s war against the Indian government and its ‘regional expansionist mentality’, Rajiv Gandhi’s murder diverted the public opinion, as it was an act of terrorism.

However, there are other controversies, such as his wife, Sonia Gandhi, and other politicians could have been behind the murder.

In May 1992, Indian government filed charges against 41 accused in a lengthy report citing 1180 "material objects" and 1477 documents. Of the 41 accused people, 12 were dead and 26had spent many months in prison without charges.

On the 28th January 1998, all 26men and women were sentenced to death by hanging. Their individual culpability and motive was assumed on the basis of general observations.

The execution of three innocents is arranged before the 09.09.2011. Amnesty International has claimed the forthcoming execution of the three men convicted for the assassination of former Indian premier Rajiv Gandhi as “a death sentence wrongly given to innocent Tamils.”

Two Sri Lankans and an Indian national condemned for the assassination of Mr Gandhi are facing imminent execution in Vellore prison in Tamil Nadu.

The inexcusable allegations against those prisoners, such as“travelling with LTTE cadres” and “buying batteries”, show that they are innocents.

A 20-year-old woman immolated herself inside the Taluk office in Kancheepuram on Sunday evening, protestingthe death sentence presented to Santhan, Murugan and G. Perarivalan aliasArivu, convicted of plotting the 1991 assassination of the former PrimeMinister, Rajiv Gandhi.

The Indian and Sri Lankan governments are attempting to divert the attention towards the innocent accused.

Indian state terrorism is performing the genocide by evacuating and murdering indigenous people in from their own home land in their own country on behalf of corporate companies. Indian military and government participated with Sri Lankan government just to massacre more than fifty thousand innocents within three days.

Now the innocents are anticipating their death sentence. They are expecting the world’s support and help, to escape from state terrorism.

-Saba Navalan

They are minimising the ideological struggle by Indra Mohan Sigdel "Basanta"



Thanks to the Comrades of The Next Front Nepal for making this available.

A serious ideological struggle is going on in our party now. While saying so, it does not mean that there was no ideological struggle in our party before. It perseveres in a party; sometimes it is extensive and sharp and sometimes not. Moreover, it does not always centre on only one issue; but on different issues depending on time and context. The ideological struggle in our party has now been manifested in two lines, Marxism or reformism, and it has centred on ideological, political and organisational lines. It is very much piercing and serious too.

Two-line struggle is the life of a party. It is also known as the motive force of a party. Struggle is the base of unity. Mao has stressed on transformation for a new unity to take place upon a new base. Unity is not achieved through compromise, higher level of unity is not achieved without transformation and there is no transformation in default of struggle. That is why, two-line struggle is said to be the motive force of a party.

After we entered into the peace process, the two-line struggle that had surfaced from our party’s Balaju Expanded meeting has been going on till today. In essence, the ongoing struggle is focused on ideological and political questions. However, its central expression has been in different forms depending upon time and context. From the Balaju expanded meeting to now, the two-line struggle in our party has developed through different phases, which can be mentioned in short as follows.

First, the phase of struggle against bourgeois working-style. Once our party entered into the cities after signing in the comprehensive peace agreement bourgeois working-style started to dominate in the party. Most of the leaders and cadres forgot their previous bases, the poverty-stricken countryside, rather started enjoying in big hotels, in the name of building cities a base of revolutionaries. The struggle, which was waged in Balaju meeting against the danger that the problem in working-style of that kind may become a cause to liquidate party’s revolutionary line and as a result the revolution, is noteworthy to mention here. However, the document adopted by Balaju expanded meeting was never distributed in the party to study and implement in practice. Why it happened so, is a serious issue to sum up in the days ahead.

Second, the phase of inner struggle to determine party’s new tactic. Subsequent to the first meeting of the Constituent Assembly, which declared Nepal a federal democratic republic, party’s tactic adopted by the CC meeting in Chunwang had ended. In that situation, the party must have adopted another tactic right away, but that did not happen. Party did not have any tactic almost all through a period of one year after democratic republic of Nepal was declared. In the situation when the old tactic was over and the new one was not taken up it was obvious for the party not to have any plan to go ahead except cycling around the parliamentary exercise. It was necessary for this situation to bring the ideological struggle to the fore centring on what should be the next tactic. There was a sharp and extensive two-line struggle in Kharipati Convention held on November 2008. Finally, elucidating that Nepal was still a semi-feudal and semi-colonial country and the federal democratic republic was a reactionary political system, party adopted a new tactic, People’s Federal Republic, to accomplish new democratic revolution. This tactic is still valid and is awaiting its execution.

Third, the phase of developing plans to implement the aforesaid tactic. Kharipati convention succeeded to build up party’s next tactic but failed again to put forward a concrete plan to implement it. Party didn’t bring in any tangible plan till about nine months after the convention was concluded. Later, three months long central committee meeting in August 2009 took up some important decisions. Of them the decisions, first, people’s insurrection is a must to establish People’s Federal Republic and second, four preparations and four bases are the prerequisites necessary to make people’s insurrection a success, were the important ones. These decisions, which were adopted through a process of intense ideological and political struggle carried all the way through three months, are very much important in our party history.

Interview with Tarzan of PLA



The Winter Has Its End team caught up with this young fighter while on route to Thawang, Rolpa.

Bin Prasad (Tarzan) is an active PLA member and we caught up with him while he was outside of the cantonments for a break.

Thanks to Revolution in South Asia for this video

Sunday, August 28, 2011

Maoists Return to Power in Nepal


 Barburam Bhattarai  vice Chairman of Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), was on Sunday elected Nepal’s 35th prime minister. The 57-year-old former finance minister defeated his Nepali Congress rival Ram Chandra Poudel by a margin of 105 votes.

  Bhattarai secured support of 340 members of the 594-member parliament.

“Even though the next government would be formed through majority but the door for consensus (to conclude the tasks of peace and constitution drafting) would remain open,” Bhattarai told parliament before the election.

With this victory, Maoists return back to power after a gap of 27 months. The previous Maoist government led by party chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda had resigned in May 2009.

Despite being the dominant partner in the previous coalition, Maoists had agreed to let Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist) chairman Jhalanath Khanal lead the government.

Bhattarai’s victory became certain prior to voting as United Democratic Madeshi Forum, the conglomeration of five Madhesi parties with 71 seats, announced its support to the Maoist leader.

Leaders of UDMF decided on extending support after Maoists agreed to a four point deal that included details on integration and rehabilitation of former Maoist combatants and making Nepal Army more inclusive.

On the other hand, Poudel failed to reach the magic figure of 298 votes despite support of CPN (UML). He had suffered 16 successive defeats in the previous PM election as well.

Bhattarai’s election follows resignation of his predecessor Jhalanath Khanal on August 15 to make way for a national consensus government. But since parties failed to arrive at consensus on government formation, the prime minister was elected through majority vote in parliament.

An alumnus of Delhi School of Planning and Architecture and Jawaharlal Nehru University, election of the farmer’s son from Gorkha to the top post is expected to speed up the stalled peace and constitution drafting processes.

Since election to the Constituent Assembly in 2008 Nepal has witnessed three governments, but the two important tasks that were to be completed within two years are nowhere near completion.

Another deadline for both tasks ends on August 31. There is a proposal to amend the interim constitution one more time and extend the Constituent Assembly’s tenure by three more months.

Bhattarai would have to bridge consensus among all parties including Nepali Congress and CPN (UML) to conclude the peace process and give the country’s its new statute within that period.

Improving his party’s equation with India which soured due to Maoist chief Prachanda’s remarks targeting the southern neighbour as Nepal’s principal enemy would be another crucial task.

Though India rebuffed Prachanda’s subsequent attempts at reconciliation, Bhattarai who has more contacts with the political leadership in New Delhi could succeed on this front

Source : Hindustan Times

Saturday, August 27, 2011

Protest at Southwark Town Hall on 31st August for 6th August defendants


Comrades and Friends the first defendants of the Rebellion of August 6th are now starting to appear at crown courts in London.

Southwark council is one of the inner London Councils launching a new offensive against the poor by threatening to evict families of people convicted of rioting from council housing.

It has sent letters threatening council housing tenants with eviction if they or their relatives are convicted of offences in the riots.

A protest has been called at its next council meeting on Wednesday 31 August. Assemble 5pm, Southwark Town Hall, Peckham Road. Please make every effort to attend.

The Pan-Afrikan Voice

The March 26th Movement

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Real Revolutionaries - Offical Video from AP2P (M-1 and Bonnot) feat. General Levy and Paolo Fresu



"Real Revolutionaries" Official Video from AP2P (M-1 and Bonnot) feat. General Levy and Paolo Fresu

The Second Colonisation of Africa - The View of Lode Vanoost



For more view on the situation in Libya, RT talks to international consultant and former deputy speaker of the Belgian Parliament, Lode Vanoost

Monday, August 22, 2011

The New Afrikan Black Panther Party – Prison Chapter: Our Line

By Kevin ‘Rashid’ Johnson, Defense Minister, NBPP-PC

Democracy and Class Struggle publishes this paper of Comrade Kevin "Rashid"  Johnson because a lot of the message in this article is relevant to the struggle in Britain in 2011. The question of a Vanguard Party and its engagement with the Lumpen Proletariat is addressed in this article,these are key questions in the current Uprising in Britain in 2011.


Introduction

In this paper, we outline the political and ideological line of the New Afrikan Black Panther Party – Prison Chapter. The NABPP-PC, an all Afrikan people’s revolutionary party, proposes through its work and example to spread its line to the general NABPP on the outside, and to all revolutionary-minded New Afrikans, and Ultimately to expand the Party into a broad international vanguard of all Afrikan people the world over. We are in full accord with the analysis set forward in ‘The Panther and the Elephant,” which this paper intends to further illuminate..

The Vanguard Party

As a vehicle for coordinating masses of people for action, organization is necessary. Planning is necessary, and so is assigning roles and tasks to those most capable of performing them, and holding them accountable for performing their assigned tasks completely and to the best of their abilities. Coordinating the activities of the active forces of the Afrikan Nation in America towards the achievement of full democracy and national liberation requires a genuine vanguard party based among the masses. No revolutionary or genuine national independence struggle has ever succeeded without a party to organize and coordinate the energy of the struggling people into focused result-oriented action.

“From the People to the People” is the Mass line – the opposite of top-down organizations. The NABPP-PC practices and promotes the Mass line. In applying this, the Party workers must go among the People, and, by living with them and struggling along side them, experience and learn their needs, ideas and interests. The Party then – applying the principles of Historical and Dialectical Materialism – returns the People’s unorganized ideas to them in a comprehensive form, coordinating their collective actions, resources and abilities around their needs and thereby aids and organizes them in solving their own problems.

As a revolutionary vanguard party, the NABPP-PC realizes that strategic or tactical inflexibility runs counter to the organic nature of a mass-based leading party. Such a party must operate within the limits of existing concrete conditions as they develop and change, and it cannot attempt to drive people to stick stubbornly and mechanically to methods of struggle which actual conditions do not support or allow. It has been by failing to exercise flexibility and initiative and practicing “commandism” that many would-be revolutionary movements in the past have failed and have given vanguard parties a bad name.

Our strategic and tactical decision-making process is that of Democratic Centralism, which does not contradict applying the Mass Line. Nor does it go against maintaining flexibility and initiative and being creative in our political work. Democratic Centralism is the method by which our Party determines, through intense internal discussion, debate, and then majority agreement, the Party’s overall strategic and tactical line. The basic principle is to raise criticisms and ideas up and to implement down. Once a strategy and tactical approach is decided, the lower bodies of the Party can then exercise a great deal of initiative and creativity in applying the line in practice, adapting to the particularities of local conditions.

At the heart of any democratic process is the need and right to be informed of all issues relevant to making accurate analysis and correct decisions. Therefore, Party cadre must never stop learning, (and teaching the People), and must never hold stubbornly to views not supported by the ongoing experience of the Party. Our sources of learning are our people’s life experience, books, and especially ourpractice. We must never stop learning.

Essential to democratic practice is criticism and self-criticism. All Party members must feel free to criticize other Party members and leaders, line and practice within the context of internal Democratic Centralism. The Party must also be open to listening to the criticisms of the masses. If what is unproductive or harmful cannot be criticized, then how can what is productive and good be determined?

The Party will exercise greater or lesser degrees of centralism, depending upon the freedom and necessity of the struggle in a given time and place. For example, security considerations may restrict the ability to hold discussions and force the leadership to assume more authoritative methods at times, restricting certain information, to protect the cadre or the Party as a whole. But overall, our goal is to promote democracy and collective decision making. In all cases, we must adjust and adapt new, varied and creative tactics and approaches to maintain the initiative in our work and avoid becoming predictable and thus susceptible to being out manoeuvred and defeated.


Classes and Class Struggle

On the point of classes and class struggle, we adopt the analysis presented in ‘The Panther and the Elephant,” we also add in relation to the lumpen Proletariat that the NABPP-PC, as its name implies, is an autonomous chapter of the NABPP centered within the prisons. The vast majority of prisoners in the U.S. are proletarians, but many come from a lumpen background, and all are influenced by this perspective in the context of prison culture. The lumpen class overlaps with the proletariat, (drifts in and out of employment), but maintains an outlook that opposes a proletarian class outlook. The lumpen’s confused and backward values stem from its position of preying upon others and general ignorance, which can be corrected through education and struggle, and through guided practice in a mass organization like the Black Brigade. A minimum condition for the acceptance of lumpen class militants into the Party must be a period of re-education and practice inside a Party-affiliated mass organization like the Black Brigade, where we can observe their practice and they can remold their class outlook and develop into a full-time, all-the- way revolutionary.

Contradictions in Proletarian Versus Lumpen Perspectives

Many people when presented with the Marxist-Leninist-Maoist idea that that only the proletariat can lead in making all-the-way revolutionary class struggle question why this is, and why some other class, (without changing its class perspective), cannot lead such a struggle. One reason is because the proletariat is the only class that has no real stake in preserving the class relations of the capitalist system, but has everything to gain in taking control over the social wealth it has itself created by its labor and the tools it uses to create it. Another reason is that the proletariat, (in contrast to the lumpen), has the conditioning in patient work, social unity and cooperation necessary to wage the protracted class struggle required to abolish all exploitation and oppression. Basically, it is our social practice that determines how we think and not how we think that determines our social practice.

The proletariat has a strong sense of family commitment and unity and a sense of respect for and commitment to the community. These values grow out of the routine of going to work each day in the social environment of the workplace to provide for the needs of one’s family, and not only maintaining employment but also engaging in domestic labor in the home, rearing· children, and taking part in the social life of the community. This requires and instils stability, discipline and responsibility as well as cooperation with one’s peers.

The class conscious worker can be of two sorts, the militant and the revolutionary. The militant worker takes the sense of commitment beyond the family into the workplace and will stand up to the bosses for workers’ rights, even to the extent of jeopardizing one’s employment, freedom and safety by participating in strikes and job actions. The revolutionary worker takes the sense of commitment even farther and challenges the oppressive social order to change the social relations for all and put an end to class exploitation and oppression once and for all. The revolutionary is inspired by a great love for the people and sense of duty to the masses and to future generations.
The revolutionary worker doesn’t swagger or boast and has little sense of ego. He or she is serious-minded and self-disciplined. The revolutionary knows that like a strike, the revolutionary struggle must be a united mass struggle, and that it will take quite some time to succeed. Each contribution is important, and the end result is to benefit the overall society. In contrast to the proletarian’s practice and outlook, the lumpen schemes and preys upon others to acquire survival needs and personal wealth, which renders him or her indifferent to the effects visited upon others and society as a whole.

The lumpen mentality mirrors – on a smaller scale and with less sophistication – that of the big gangsters (the monopoly capitalists), and amounts to a ruthless drive for immediate self-gratification, power, control and “respect,” (even though their lifestyle is anything but respectable), through deception, corruption, violence and intimidation of others. These tendencies are what lies behind certain lumpen aspiring to be perceived as “crazy” and unpredictably violent.

Translated into the revolutionary movement, the lumpen tendency has some thinking that militant swaggering, posturing, and ”talking shit,” is acceptable behavior for revolutionaries, which is very wrong and demonstrates political immaturity and lack of a true proletarian outlook. Such posturing leads to actions of a reactionary, adventurist and provocateur nature, that invites enemy attack that the movement is unprepared to deal with and alienates the masses. Comrade Sundiata Acoli, (a member of the old BPP and BLA), observed that just such lumpen tendencies contributed to the downfall of the old BPP and the general Black Liberation Movement in America. (See Sundiata Acoli, ” A Brief History of the Black Panther Party and its place in the Black Liberation Movement.” (1985), which is posted on the internet and was recently reprinted in the Summer Issue of Leviathan, the newsletter of the Black Brigade).

Also, because they are conditioned to seek immediate and short term benefits in their daily practice, the lumpen generally lack the resolve to pursue and stick with tasks that require hard work and patience. We in the NBPP-PC feel that a major factor that led to the old BPP’s destruction was the failure to raise many of the Party’s members’ world view to that of the revolutionary proletariat and allowing the Party and its leadership to become saturated in lumpen ideology, values and practice.
The motives behind revolutionary violence are fundamentally different from the reactionary violence of the lumpen, who model their violence after that of the big gangsters. Revolutionary violence is rooted in the collective resistance of the masses organized against the violence of the big gangster bourgeoisie system of repression and exploitation. History is made by the collective masses, with the genuine revolutionary vanguard serving to raise their consciousness and organize their force into collective revolutionary struggle. Correct thinking is the catalyst. just as intelligence draws order out of chaos – out of the chaos of noise music, and out of chaos of images and color – art.

Raising the Lumpen Outlook to a Revolutionary Proletarian Outlook

To serve in the capacity of a truly revolutionary vanguard, the Party must consist of committed, disciplined people who have the outlook of truly revolutionary workers; people who are committed to work every day in a patient and disciplined way until the conditions for a revolutionary seizure of power by the masses arise. Without remolding their class outlook, the lumpen will pursue ultra-leftist militant acts of exhibitionism and spew forth “Off the Pig!” rhetoric, and when this provokes repression from the Establishment, they will flip-flop to right opportunism, tum rat and become enemy agents, or run for cover. Lacking correct analysis, self-discipline and patience, they will vacillate left to right, and they will confuse one stage of the struggle for another and try to skip the stages that require hard work and tenacity.

These elements disdain to apply the Mass Line, ignore the Democratic Centralism of the Party, fear Criticism and Self-Criticism and lean towards individualism and “commandism,” indulging in personal attacks and attempts at intimidation and coercion of other Party members and the masses through threats and force. Their unremolded lumpen ideology is a corrosive to building Party unity and maintaining discipline, and it makes them easy prey for recruitment by the enemy. The lumpen are capable of “the most heroic deeds and the most exalted sacrifices, or of the basest banditry and dirtiest corruption.”

A large part of our work in NBPP-PC is to properly educate and reorient the lumpen through ideological and political training and bringing as many of them who are capable of “the most heroic deeds and the most exalted sacrifices” into the active work of the struggle as possible, and thereby expand the Party while struggling against opportunism, both of the “left” and right varieties. We know that in this work, the enemy will unceasingly attempt to infiltrate its agents of repression and seek out the weak links among us to turn them into their snitches and agent-provocateurs, and we must be vigilant to guard against this, without becoming paranoid; In the struggle, “ideological and political line determines everything,” and we must rely on ideological and political training and commitment to practicing the Mass Line, Criticism and Self-Criticism and the Democratic Centralist method of determining what should be done and how to do it.


We realize that the lumpen are our brothers and sisters, and we do not desire to make war on them, rather we look upon their wrong ideas and lack of understanding as loads upon their backs, and we endeavor to help them cast them off. “Cure the sickness to save the patient,” is our goal. However, we are not naive idealists, and we realize that there are those who lack the moral fiber and will to change or courage for the struggle. Some people have no integrity or loyalty, and those who, after struggle, persist in wrong ways must be purged from the ranks of the people’s movement.

Before someone is recruited into the Party, they must be tested and prove themselves in the people’s mass organizations, like the Black Brigade. They must show proof of both good character and advanced understanding of what needs to be done. Words are cheap. Practice is the measure of commitment and the way consciousness develops.

Our goal is to be more than a prison organization. The struggle of our New Afrikan and Afrikan people worldwide cries out for vanguard leadership. With the Black proletariat concentrated in America and Europe and our peasantry concentrated in Afrika, we have an internationalist duty to provide revolutionary proletarian leadership and to set an inspiring example. Our struggle against imperialism and neo-colonialism is a class struggle of international dimensions. We have much to learn and much to do. We must become good at learning and resolute in struggle.

ALL POWER TO THE PEOPLE